Notable Cases
R v W - Case Success: Youth Client Acquitted of Murder and Robbery at the Old Bailey
We represented a youth client charged with murder and robbery in a multi-handed case before a jury at the Central Criminal Court (the Old Bailey). Our client was one of three defendants tried over the course of a six-week trial, facing allegations that carried the most serious consequences.
From the outset, we recognised that the key to this case lay in meticulous preparation and relentless analysis of the evidence. Our defence team undertook a detailed review of the prosecution material, focusing on gaps, inconsistencies and unexplained features within the Crown’s case. Particular attention was paid to the timing and sequence of events, the reliability of witness accounts and the interplay between different strands of forensic and factual evidence.
We instructed a range of specialist experts, including those in pathology and related forensic disciplines, to rigorously test the Crown’s theory of how the incident unfolded. The pathology evidence was carefully examined and challenged, with our experts providing alternative interpretations that supported our client’s account and undermined key assertions made by the prosecution.
At the conclusion of the six-week trial, the jury acquitted our client of both murder and robbery. The verdict reflects the hard work, strategic planning and thorough preparation invested in the case, and underlines our commitment to providing youth clients with the highest standard of representation in the most serious and demanding proceedings.
If you or a family member are facing allegations of serious violence or robbery, particularly as a young person, our team is ready to provide expert, dedicated and carefully tailored defence.
R v B - Case Success: Client Acquitted in International Drug Trafficking Case Involving Modern Slavery
Our firm secured a full acquittal in a highly complex and internationally sensitive drug importation case involving allegations of South American cartel activity. The case centred on a middle-aged Argentinian mother of three who had been trafficked and exploited by an organised criminal network, coerced into acting as a drug mule, and forced to swallow over 1 kilogram of cocaine before travelling.
She was intercepted at Heathrow Airport while en route to Tokyo, where the packages were allegedly intended to be recovered by members of the trafficking organisation. Despite the serious nature of the allegations and the significant weight of drugs involved, we identified at an early stage that the true issue in the case was exploitation, not criminality.
Our defence focused on establishing that she was a victim of modern slavery, targeted and controlled by an international cartel. We instructed an expert in South American drug-mule trafficking, whose evidence was pivotal in demonstrating the methods used by such networks, the coercion and threats faced by victims, and the absence of genuine autonomy in their actions.
Through meticulous preparation, detailed analysis of the surrounding circumstances and effective presentation of expert evidence, we were able to show that our client’s involvement was the direct result of exploitation, vulnerability and trafficking. The jury accepted the modern slavery defence in full, and she was acquitted of all charges.
This case demonstrates our firm’s capability in handling high-level, cross-border criminal allegations, particularly those involving vulnerable individuals exploited by organised crime groups. It also highlights the importance of specialist expertise, strategic case-building and compassionate client representation in securing just outcomes.
If you require advice or representation in a case involving allegations of drug importation, trafficking or modern slavery, our specialist team is available to assist.
R v L - Case Success: Acquittal in Domestic Rape Allegation Following Extensive Preparation
We represented a client charged with domestic rape, where the central issue in the case was consent. The allegation arose within a personal relationship and involved highly sensitive and emotionally charged circumstances.
The defence required detailed and methodical preparation over an extended period. Our team conducted a thorough analysis of the complainant’s account, carefully testing its consistency, plausibility and alignment with the surrounding evidence. Particular emphasis was placed on the detailed examination of mobile phone communications, both before and after the alleged incident, which proved critical in challenging the prosecution’s narrative.
By analysing message content, timing and context, we were able to expose weaknesses in the Crown’s case and demonstrate that the evidence did not support the allegation as presented. This meticulous approach was central to undermining the prosecution’s position and advancing a robust defence.
Following an emotionally demanding legal process lasting over two and a half years from arrest, our client was acquitted. The outcome reflects the importance of careful preparation, detailed evidence analysis and unwavering commitment in defending allegations of the utmost seriousness.
R v S - Murder Bail
We secured bail for our client in this investigation which is ongoing. We cannot comment further at this stage during this sensitive investigation.
R v H - Death by Dangerous Driving
We secured bail for our client in this investigation which is ongoing. We cannot comment further at this stage during this sensitive investigation.
R v P - Appeal on Rape conviction sentence. Reduced from 24 years to 18.
We represented this client in an appeal against what was submitted to be an unduly harsh sentence. The original term of 24 years’ imprisonment had been imposed for multiple counts of rape involving multiple complainants. Through meticulous preparation, detailed analysis of the sentencing judge’s remarks, and careful consideration of the relevant case law and sentencing guidelines, we advanced strong and well-supported arguments before the Court of Appeal.
The Court accepted our submissions, resulting in a substantial reduction of the sentence from 24 years to 18 years.
R v S - Case Success: Client Acquitted in Honour-Based Stalking and Assault Allegation
We successfully represented a client accused of honour-based stalking and assault, with the allegations said to be motivated by so-called Islamic honour. The case involved serious claims, including threats to kill, stalking, and physical assault.
The prosecution relied heavily on cell-site analysis, alongside media evidence such as voice recordings, to place our client at key locations and support the complainant’s account. Our team undertook a detailed and forensic challenge to the accuracy, interpretation and reliability of this material. We scrutinised the cell-site evidence, questioned the methodology used, and exposed weaknesses in the Crown’s technical assumptions. The media evidence was similarly contested, highlighting gaps, inconsistencies and issues affecting attribution.
Through thorough preparation and strategic intervention, we were able to undermine the core foundations of the prosecution’s case. The Crown offered no evidence before the trial started.
This outcome reflects our firm’s commitment to challenging complex digital evidence, dismantling speculative allegations, and providing robust defence in cases involving cultural, religious or honour-based elements.
R v S - Case Success: Acquittal in Multi-Handed Wounding With Intent Case
We represented a client charged alongside two co-defendants with wounding with intent, arising from an incident in which the complainant sustained serious injuries, including deep lacerations said to have been caused by a machete. The prosecution relied on extensive forensic material, including blood-spatter evidence at the scene and on clothing, to support its case.
From the outset, we advanced a clear and robust defence of self-defence, supported by a detailed analysis of the forensic evidence and the circumstances leading up to the incident. Through careful preparation, strategic cross-examination and a focused presentation of our client’s account, we were able to challenge key elements of the prosecution’s case and expose inconsistencies in their interpretation of events.
At the conclusion of the trial, our client was acquitted, reflecting the strength of the defence, the depth of preparation involved, and our commitment to achieving the best possible outcomes in serious violence cases.
R v L - Case Success: Client Acquitted in Joint Enterprise Arson Case
We represented a defendant charged with Arson, reckless as to whether life was endangered, in a case brought on a joint enterprise basis. The allegation concerned a vehicle set alight beside a residential property, creating a serious risk to those inside and attracting significant prosecutorial attention.
The Crown’s case relied heavily on cell-site and digital evidence in an attempt to place our client at the scene and establish involvement in the planning and execution of the offence. Our team conducted a detailed and forensic challenge to this material, scrutinising the accuracy of the data, the assumptions made by investigators, and the reliability of the conclusions drawn.
Through meticulous preparation, expert analysis and focused cross-examination, we dismantled the prosecution’s digital narrative and demonstrated that the evidence did not support our client’s alleged participation.
At the conclusion of the trial, our client was acquitted, reflecting the strength of the defence and our firm’s capability in successfully contesting serious allegations involving complex digital and forensic evidence.
R v M - Case Success: Acquittal in Serious Assault Allegation Involving Life-Changing Injuries
We represented a client accused of causing serious and life-changing injuries, with allegations that the complainant had been stabbed to the face and back. The incident was highly contested and complex, particularly as our client had also sustained significant injuries, including a broken arm and multiple lacerations.
From the outset, we advanced a clear and robust defence of self-defence. Our case was supported by a detailed forensic examination of the blood-spatter evidence, as well as careful analysis of the nature, location and pattern of injuries sustained by both parties. This evidence was central to challenging the prosecution’s assertion that the incident involved a targeted attack.
Through meticulous preparation and expert-led analysis, we were able to demonstrate that the events did not unfold as alleged by the Crown. The forensic evidence supported our client’s account and exposed weaknesses in the prosecution’s narrative.
At the conclusion of the case, our client was acquitted, reflecting the strength of the defence, the importance of forensic scrutiny, and our commitment to delivering carefully prepared and effective representation in the most serious assault cases.
R v B - Case Success: Favourable Outcome in Large-Scale Cocaine Importation Conspiracy
We represented a client accused of involvement in a conspiracy to import approximately 30 kilograms of cocaine from Jamaica, following an interception at Heathrow Airport. The allegation concerned a serious, high-value importation attracting substantial sentencing exposure.
While the prosecution sought to characterise our client as having a significant role within the conspiracy, our defence focused on a detailed and forensic challenge to the level of alleged involvement. Through careful analysis of the evidence, communications and the wider structure of the operation, we were able to demonstrate that the prosecution’s portrayal of our client’s role was overstated.
At the sentencing stage, we advanced robust submissions addressing role, knowledge and culpability, ensuring that the court was presented with a clear and accurate picture of our client’s true position within the alleged conspiracy. This focused and strategic approach resulted in a strong and favourable outcome, significantly mitigating the potential sentence faced.
This case highlights the importance of specialist representation in serious drug conspiracy matters, particularly where careful analysis and advocacy at sentencing can make a decisive difference to the final outcome.
R v G - Case Success: Suspended Sentence Secured in Cannabis Importation Case
We represented a client accused of importing approximately 23 kilograms of cannabis from Thailand, following interception at Heathrow Airport. The allegation carried the risk of a substantial custodial sentence, given the quantity involved and the international nature of the importation.
Our defence focused on a careful and forensic challenge to the prosecution’s assessment of our client’s role and level of knowledge within the alleged offence. By analysing the surrounding circumstances and the evidence relied upon, we were able to demonstrate that our client’s culpability was significantly lower than alleged by the Crown.
At the sentencing stage, we advanced strong submissions addressing role, intent and proportionality, ensuring the court was presented with a balanced and accurate picture of our client’s involvement. As a result of this detailed preparation and advocacy, the court imposed a suspended sentence, allowing our client to avoid immediate custody.
This outcome highlights the importance of specialist representation and strategic sentencing advocacy in serious drug importation cases, where a detailed understanding of role and culpability can be decisive.
R v A - Case Success: Best Sentencing Outcome Secured in Multi-Handed Class A Drug Conspiracy
We represented a client charged as part of a large-scale conspiracy to supply Class A drugs, indicted alongside nine other defendants in a complex and wide-ranging prosecution.
Through strategic intervention and meticulous preparation, we undertook a detailed analysis of the evidence, including extensive cell-site data mapping, to accurately assess our client’s position within the alleged conspiracy. This technical review was central to challenging the prosecution’s characterisation of our client’s role and level of culpability.
By presenting a clear and carefully supported case at sentencing, we were able to distinguish our client’s involvement from that of the other defendants and advance strong mitigation. As a result, our client received the most favourable sentence of all those charged, reflecting the effectiveness of the defence strategy and the importance of specialist analysis in complex drug conspiracy cases.
R v N - Case Success: Representation in National-Scale Driving Test Fraud Investigation
We represented a client suspected of involvement in a national-scale fraud investigation, where it was alleged that they had been taking driving tests on behalf of other individuals. The matter was treated with significant seriousness by the authorities, given the alleged scale and implications of the conduct.
Our firm provided representation from the police station stage through to the Crown Court, ensuring continuity, strategic oversight and robust defence at every stage of the proceedings. From the outset, we carefully assessed the evidence relied upon by the prosecution, challenged investigative assumptions and advised our client through each phase of the case.
Through detailed preparation and consistent representation, we worked to protect our client’s position, address the allegations effectively and ensure that their rights were safeguarded throughout the process. This case demonstrates our ability to manage complex fraud investigations from their earliest stages through to court proceedings, with a clear focus on strategy, preparation and client care.
R v D - Case Success: Suspended Sentence and Return of Seized Cash in Unregulated Money Lending Case
We represented a client accused of involvement in unregulated money lending, with allegations that they were acting as a loan shark. The prosecution’s case initially exposed our client to the risk of immediate custody, alongside significant financial consequences.
Our defence focused on a detailed forensic analysis of financial records and bank data, enabling us to challenge the prosecution’s calculations and assumptions. Through careful examination of transactions, patterns and source material, we were able to significantly reduce the sums alleged by the Crown and present a more accurate and proportionate picture of our client’s conduct.
At the sentencing stage, we advanced strong submissions based on this financial analysis, resulting in the court imposing a suspended sentence, allowing our client to avoid immediate imprisonment. In addition, we successfully secured the return of cash seized from our client’s address during the investigation.
This outcome highlights the importance of specialist financial scrutiny and strategic advocacy in complex economic crime cases, where careful preparation can dramatically alter both sentencing and asset recovery outcomes.
R v S - Case Success: Suspended Sentence Secured in Serious Sexual Offence Case
We represented a client charged with sexual communications with a child, attempting to cause a child to engage in sexual activity, and making indecent images of children. The allegations were extremely serious and carried the potential for a lengthy custodial sentence, alongside long-term personal and reputational consequences.
From the outset, the case required careful handling, detailed preparation and strategic advocacy, with close attention paid to the evidence, the surrounding circumstances and the applicable sentencing framework. Our defence team undertook a thorough assessment of the prosecution material and advanced focused submissions aimed at ensuring the court was presented with a balanced and accurate understanding of the case.
Through effective representation and carefully prepared mitigation, we were able to secure a suspended sentence, allowing our client to avoid immediate custody. This outcome reflects the importance of specialist representation in serious sexual offence matters, particularly at the sentencing stage, where detailed preparation and clear advocacy can have a decisive impact on the final outcome.
R v S: Pre-Charge Intervention
We represented a high-net-worth individual who was arrested in connection with domestic-related allegations, including assault and controlling and coercive behaviour. The allegations centred on claims of financial and social control within a personal relationship and carried the potential for serious legal, professional and reputational consequences.
Given the complexity and sensitivity of the matter, our approach focused on detailed case preparation and strategic early intervention. We conducted multiple in-depth conferences with our client to take comprehensive instructions and gain a full understanding of the relationship history. This included a meticulous review of WhatsApp communications, contextual analysis of interactions over time, and a thorough examination of financial records relied upon by the complainant.
Using this material, we prepared and submitted detailed written representations to the police, systematically challenging the allegations and highlighting inconsistencies, omissions and contextual issues that undermined the prosecution narrative. Our submissions presented a clear, balanced and evidence-led account of the relationship dynamics.
As a result of this careful preparation and proactive engagement, the police closed the investigation with no further action taken against our client. Crucially, this outcome ensured that our client’s reputation, professional standing and personal life were preserved.
This case demonstrates the importance of specialist representation, early intervention and discretion in domestic allegations, particularly for individuals whose personal and professional lives are vulnerable to reputational harm.
Real Results for Real People
Notable Wins
- R v W: Murder Acquittal at the Old Bailey - Youth client acquitted after 6-week trial
- R v B: Drug Importation Acquittal - Modern slavery defence for trafficking victim
- R v C: Section 18 GBH Acquittal - Self-defence in serious wounding case
- R v S: Honour-Based Stalking - Crown discontinued at trial after evidence challenge
- R v L: Arson Acquittal - Joint enterprise case dismissed after digital evidence challenge
- R v M: Section 18 Stabbing Acquittal - Serious assault case won at trial
Why Fraser Masood
A Different Kind of Criminal Solicitor
Fraser Masood brings fresh energy to criminal defence. Whilst other solicitors play it safe, we challenge the system with a dynamic approach.
Track Record:
- One of the youngest qualified criminal duty solicitors in West London
- Built practice from startup to major regional provider in 3 years
- Excellent outcomes at the most prominent courts in the country.
Youth meets experience
Hungry for wins, skilled in strategy
Personal service
Fraser Masood handles serious cases personally
Direct approach
We tell you the truth, not what you want to hear
Professional focus
We understand what you have to lose
Get In Touch
Your Future Depends on What You Do Right Now
Every hour you wait makes this situation harder to resolve.
The investigation is happening whether you’re prepared or not. The only question is whether you’ll have expert protection fighting for you.
Don’t face this alone. Don’t wait for charges to be filed. Act now.